The Emergence of Neoliberal Policies and the Critique of Contemporary Globalization
In an interconnected world, the dialogue on globalisation is frequently found at the meeting point of varied perspectives on autonomy and justice. The text by Moneta, which is not a critical essay against globalization per se, seeks to reinvent the contours of a new humanism via the perspective of natural transfers as envisioned by Aristotelian philosophy. By decrying artificial exchanges that fuel modern systems of oppression and vulnerability, the author refers to classical thoughts to highlight the failures of our global economic system.
From a historical perspective, globalization is not a new phenomenon. Its beginnings can be traced back to the propositions of the economist Ricardo, whose ambition was aimed at allowing the United Kingdom to extend its global trade power. Nonetheless, what was once a economic growth opportunity has morphed into a tool of domination by High Finance, marked by the rise of economic liberalism. Against commonly held ideas supported by economic consensus, the book argues that neoliberalism is in reality a framework rooted in ancient practices, which traces back to four and a half millennia.
The objection also covers the administration of the European Union, seen as a chain of surrenders that have served to strengthen the power of financial elites rather than protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies frequently driven by monetary concerns opposed to a popular consensus, is criticized. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only intensified the doubt of the writer about the Union’s capacity to change intrinsically.
This thinker, while accepting the prior faults that have caused the current circumstances, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also suggests responses aimed at reorienting European policies in a human-centered and fair perspective. The urgency for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a central theme that pervades the entire discourse.
The work delves more in depth into the questioning of the authority mechanisms that govern international economic flows. The analysis covers the method in which political and economic decisions are manipulated by a small group of powerful financial actors, often at the detriment of the population. This financial oligarchy, coordinated through organizations like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the International Monetary System (IMS), exerts a major grip on global financial decisions.
The author demonstrates how these organisms, claiming to economic regulation and stabilization, have historically shaped stock exchanges and national economies to favor their own benefits. The neoliberal model, far from being a emancipatory solution to classic financial limitations, is presented as a enslavement tool, enriching an elite at the destruction of the common good.
Strongly opposed regarding the handling of the euro, the critic presents the EU currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but rather as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The adoption of the euro is described as a sequence of technocratic choices that excluded citizens from decision-making processes, while exacerbating gaps between nations within the European Union.
The effects of these approaches translate in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic stagnation, and a sustained austerity policy that has eroded living conditions throughout Europe. The thinker insists that without a major transformation of economic policies, the Union continues to risk potential disruptions, potentially more destructive.
In essence, the text calls for a democratic revolution where EU peoples reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, notably openness of political mechanisms and real democratic participation that would help rebuild Europe on more equitable and sustainable bases.
Find out more about Plus de renseignements ici
The essayist asserts that the key is in a return to the principles of democracy, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that corresponds to the demands and expectations of Europeans, instead of the profits of the financial elite.